Paul is an Anti Christ

Is Paul an Apostle of Christ?

The truth about Paul (Saul of Tarsus)

1. Who is Saul of Tarsus?

2. How was he converted to Christianity?

3. Did Christ appear to Paul?

4. Is the message of Paul the same as Christ's?

5. Is Paul really an apostle of Christ?

Who was Saul of Tarsus?

Saul who became Paul.

Paul is also known as Saul of Tarsus before his conversion to Christianity. He claims that he is a Roman citizen, a Pharisee, a Gamaliel student, a Hebrew from the tribe of Benjamin.

He said that he was bent on persecuting and destroying the group that is following Christ which was known at that time as simply "The Way".

Until "Christ" appeared to him and changed his life and point of view.

Much of the details about Paul is available in the book of Acts written by Luke.

Let us examine them now with open eyes and heart.

The Conversion Scene

One incident, same book, same teller, 3 versions.

The first account.

3 As Saul was coming near the city of Damascus, suddenly a light from the sky flashed around him. 4 He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul! Why do you persecute me?" 5 "Who are you, Lord?" he asked. "I am Jesus, whom you persecute," the voice said. 6 "But get up and go into the city, where you will be told what you must do." 7 The men who were traveling with Saul had stopped, not saying a word; they heard the voice but could not see anyone.- Acts 9:3-7 TEV

Let us condense the details:

1. Light flashed around Paul

2. Paul fell to the ground

3. Men with him stopped(standing)

4. Paul told to go to the city where he will be told what he must do

5. Men heard the voice but saw no one

The second account.

6 "As I was traveling and coming near Damascus, about midday a bright light from the sky flashed suddenly around me. 7 I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, "Saul, Saul! Why do you persecute me?' 8 "Who are you, Lord?' I asked. "I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you persecute,' he said to me. 9 The men with me saw the light, but did not hear the voice of the one who was speaking to me. 10 I asked, "What shall I do, Lord?' and the Lord said to me, "Get up and go into Damascus, and there you will be told everything that God has determined for you to do.'- Acts 22:6-9 TEV

Details:

1. Light flashed around Paul

2. Paul fell to the ground

3. The position of the men with him is not described

4. Men saw the light, but now did not hear the voice

5. He was told to go to Damascus where everything that God determined him to do will be told.

The third account.

13 It was on the road at midday, Your Majesty, that I saw a light much brighter than the sun, coming from the sky and shining around me and the men traveling with me. 14 All of us fell to the ground, and I heard a voice say to me in Hebrew, "Saul, Saul! Why are you persecuting me? You are hurting yourself by hitting back, like an ox kicking against its owner's stick.' 15 "Who are you, Lord?' I asked. And the Lord answered, "I am Jesus, whom you persecute. 16 But get up and stand on your feet. I have appeared to you to appoint you as my servant. You are to tell others what you have seen of me today and what I will show you in the future. 17 I will rescue you from the people of Israel and from the Gentiles to whom I will send you. 18 You are to open their eyes and turn them from the darkness to the light and from the power of Satan to God, so that through their faith in me they will have their sins forgiven and receive their place among God's chosen people.' 19 "And so, King Agrippa, I did not disobey the vision I had from heaven.- Acts 26:13-19 TEV

Details:

1. Light shining around everyone

2. Paul fell to the ground.

3. Men with him all fell too.

4. No mention on what other men saw or heard

5. Everything is now told to him on what he should do without asking him to go anywhere else.

Please review the above. Remove all your pre-conceived notion of what and who Paul is. Read his own accounts of what happened. Then tell me, If Paul was a witness to a crime and he is stating the "facts" of what happened, will he be reliable in telling 3 different versions? These are his own accounts and yet the 5 simple details of a very short incident don't corroborate each other.

The "Jesus" that Appeared to Paul

Having proven that Paul's own accounts of what happened in his conversion are questionable, how about the "Jesus" that appeared to him?

Why is the "Jesus" that appeared to Paul is questionable?

(The following is an excerpt from the article "Angels")

1 In the meantime Saul kept up his violent threats of murder against the followers of the Lord. He went to the High Priest 2 and asked for letters of introduction to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he should find there any followers of the Way of the Lord, he would be able to arrest them, both men and women, and bring them back to Jerusalem. 3 As Saul was coming near the city of Damascus, suddenly a light from the sky flashed around him. 4 He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul! Why do you persecute me?" 5 "Who are you, Lord?" he asked. "I am Jesus, whom you persecute," the voice said. 6 "But get up and go into the city, where you will be told what you must do." 7 The men who were traveling with Saul had stopped, not saying a word; they heard the voice but could not see anyone. 8 Saul got up from the ground and opened his eyes, but could not see a thing. So they took him by the hand and led him into Damascus. 9 For three days he was not able to see, and during that time he did not eat or drink anything. 10 There was a believer in Damascus named Ananias. He had a vision, in which the Lord said to him, "Ananias!" "Here I am, Lord," he answered. 11 The Lord said to him, "Get ready and go to Straight Street, and at the house of Judas ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul. He is praying, 12 and in a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come in and place his hands on him so that he might see again." 13 Ananias answered, "Lord, many people have told me about this man and about all the terrible things he has done to your people in Jerusalem. 14 And he has come to Damascus with authority from the chief priests to arrest all who worship you." 15 The Lord said to him, "Go, because I have chosen him to serve me, to make my name known to Gentiles and kings and to the people of Israel. 16 And I myself will show him all that he must suffer for my sake." 17 So Ananias went, entered the house where Saul was, and placed his hands on him. "Brother Saul," he said, "the Lord has sent me - Jesus himself, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here. He sent me so that you might see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit." - Acts 9:1-17

Okay, what are the proofs here that the one who appeared to Paul was not really Christ? (Please take note that we are talking about this scene, as they are claimed to happen by Paul)

First, Saul of Tarsus is a man against Christ and His followers. Christ do not exert much effort to convert His opponents, He even let the doubters go away if they like, why choose a murdering opponent to lead a gigantic task of converting the gentiles?

Second, Christ never, ever introduced Himself in that manner, even when questioned under duress, Christ reply in an indirect way of making His true identity known.

Three, the most important city for Christ is not Damascus. So, if Christ would lead someone to MAKE him a convert, He would be choosing Jerusalem.

Fourth, Christ and Paul are contemporaries, if Christ would like to convert somebody, He would have approached him directly while he is still alive. Much like how He approached His 12 apostles.

Fifth, Ananias is just a believer much like everyone else, why use him? When the 12 apostles who were handpicked by Christ were still around to do that job?

Sixth, Christ never ever put an illness to anyone to convert them by making them well again later. Who do you think uses such tactic of making the people ill and then later give them the antidote so they will get well and appear to them as "saviour"? Yes! They are the kind of people we call "CON MEN" nowadays!

Seventh, Christ never ever sent anyone to the "gentiles" when He was alive. Do you think He forgot to do something that important? Instead He clearly said, He was sent only for the lost sons of Israel. (Matthew 15:24) and He clearly commanded His apostles not to go to the gentiles (Matthew 10:5). So, it is not a "forgotten" task, it is not needed and intentionally avoided. Then all of a sudden a persecutor is chosen to do this gigantic task? When your parents who are going away told you not to open the door to anyone, then someone called and said they have talked to your parents and that your parents is now asking you to open the door for this stranger, who shoud you believe? It's a widely known con-man tactic again.

Eighth, what was the point again of sending Saul to meet Ananias? Was that detail necessary for Christ? If something is not really necessary and yet it was asked to be done was it not just to create DRAMA and gain attention? Did Christ do anything just for attention?

Verdict: The "Jesus"(spirit) that appeared to Saul and Ananias is just using Christ to propagate a misleading message. It is one of the fallen angels.

Paul's Message compared to Christ's Message

Paul the converted.

Without a doubt Paul changed from a persecutor to a supporter of those who are following "The Way".

It would even appear that he taught what Christ taught. Until you examine closely and compare their teachings.

Teaching comparison 1

What was Christ's general teaching?

17 From that time Jesus began to preach his message: "Turn away from your sins, because the Kingdom of heaven is near!" - Matthew 4:17

There, at the very start of Christ's own ministry, Christ said to those He is preaching to "Turn away from your sins!", what does that mean?

You see, "sin" is the breaking of the Law (1 John 3:4). So, Christ was telling His listeners to stop breaking the Law and start obeying them. That is the correct way of turning from one's sins.

Then on Matthew 5

17 "Do not think that I have come to do away with the Law of Moses and the teachings of the prophets. I have not come to do away with them, but to make their teachings come true. 18 Remember that as long as heaven and earth last, not the least point nor the smallest detail of the Law will be done away with - not until the end of all things. 19 So then, whoever disobeys even the least important of the commandments and teaches others to do the same, will be least in the Kingdom of heaven. On the other hand, whoever obeys the Law and teaches others to do the same, will be great in the Kingdom of heaven. - Matthew 5:17-18

Clearly teaching that the Law of God should be obeyed, preserved as it is and teach others to do the same.

How can we enter life?

17 "Why do you ask me concerning what is good?" answered Jesus. "There is only One who is good. Keep the commandments if you want to enter life." - Matthew 19:17

"Keep the commandments", "obey the Law", "turn from your sins", are teaching the same thing in different ways. This is the general teaching of Christ.

What about Paul? What does Paul think about the Law of God?

This is from his first epistle to the Romans:

20 For no one is put right in God's sight by doing what the Law requires; what the Law does is to make us know that we have sinned. 21 But now God's way of putting people right with himself has been revealed. It has nothing to do with law, even though the Law of Moses and the prophets gave their witness to it. - Romans 3:20-21

What?! No one is put right in God's sight by doing the Law? Is that compatible to Christ's own words that to enter life you have to obey the Law?

If one obeys the Law to enter life as Christ said, surely God accounts the obedience to something.

Teaching comparison 2

Paul teach this :

8 Be under obligation to no one - the only obligation you have is to love one another. Whoever does this has obeyed the Law. 9 The commandments, "Do not commit adultery; do not commit murder; do not steal; do not desire what belongs to someone else" - all these, and any others besides, are summed up in the one command, "Love your neighbor as you love yourself." - Romans 13:8-9

and

14 For the whole Law is summed up in one commandment: "Love your neighbor as you love yourself." - Galatians 5:14

So is Paul teaching the truth? Is the Law of God really summed up in "Love your neighor as yourself"?

What does Christ teach?

36 "Teacher," he asked, "which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" 37 Jesus answered, " "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.' 38 This is the greatest and the most important commandment. 39 The second most important commandment is like it: "Love your neighbor as you love yourself.' 40 The whole Law of Moses and the teachings of the prophets depend on these two commandments." - Matthew 22:36-40

While Paul has the guts to teach only one commandment sums up all of God's Law and according to him, it is loving your neighbors as yourself, Christ is not teaching that, instead He said; Love God with everything you have above all, and the 2nd is to love your neighbors as yourself.

Why did Paul leave out the "greatest and the most important command of all?"

Teaching comparison 3

Paul said:

12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient : all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. - 1 Corinthians 6:12-14

14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly , triumphing over them in it. 16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days - Colossians 2:14-16

Basically Paul is teaching that everything is lawful. How about Christ?

Christ taught:

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.- John 14:15

So, if we have to keep the commandments, not everything is lawful!

Teaching comparison 4

Paul taught that nothing is "unclean"

14 I know , and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.- Romans 14:14

3 Forbidding to marry , and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. 4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.- 1 Timothy 4:3-5

How about Christ does He said the same?

14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication .- Revelations 2:14

Christ said obey the commandment (Matthew 19:17): Is there "nothing unclean" according to the commandment?

"These are unclean to you among all that creep: whosoever doth touch them, when they be dead, shall be unclean until the even." - Leviticus 11:31

and

Nevertheless these ye shall not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the cloven hoof; as the camel, and the hare, and the coney: for they chew the cud, but divide not the hoof; therefore they are unclean unto you. - Deuteronomy 14:7

Teaching comparison 5

Paul said that no one will be considered righteous because of following the Law.

20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. - Romans 3:20

11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.- Galatians 3:11-12

Is that so? No flesh? No man? Will be righteous by doing the deeds of the law?

5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. 6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.- Luke 1:5-6

Even Paul's own friend Luke, denies his claim.

Christ said If you want to enter life you have to obey the Commandments. Are there any other people mentioned in the bible who were righteous because of obeying the commandments?

Yes, because according to Isaiah:

Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings. - Isaiah 51:7

Contrary to what Paul is claiming, according to God's word, those who take His Law into their hearts are righteous!

Teaching comparison 6

Paul said:

15 For even if you have ten thousand guardians in your Christian life, you have only one father. For in your life in union with Christ Jesus I have become your father by bringing the Good News to you. 16 I beg you, then, to follow my example. - 1 Corinthian 4:15-16

Only ONE FATHER? Paul is our father in Christ??

What did Christ said about this?

9 And you must not call anyone here on earth "Father,' because you have only the one Father in heaven.- Matthew 23:9

Seems Paul's own words and his lack of knowledge about Christ is betraying his own teaching!

Teaching comparison 7

Paul said:

35 I have shown you in all things that by working hard in this way we must help the weak, remembering the words that the Lord Jesus himself said, "There is more happiness in giving than in receiving.' "- Acts 20:35

Is it true? Did Christ said that?

Try it, look that phrase up using an online tool here or even just the principle at least if you can find that Christ indeed is being quoted. Will you find anything even near that sense? No. What will you call a man that says someone said something he did not really say? Yes, a liar.

What does Christ teach about lying? Is that acceptable to God?

You are the children of your father, the Devil, and you want to follow your father's desires. From the very beginning he was a murderer and has never been on the side of truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he is only doing what is natural to him, because he is a liar and the father of all lies. - John 8:44

So in words and in deeds, Paul is so far from Christ!

There in fact is a direct opposition of stand between Christ's teachings and Paul's teachings about God.

Who do you think is correct?

Whose teaching would you choose?

So, is Paul an Apostle of Christ?

In view of what we have discussed so far, Paul will not even qualify to the level of a real simple follower of Christ.

He is not even a follower of Christ because Paul wanted to teach another gospel; the gospel of grace as he loves to call it, where the Law of God is nullified. How can he be an apostle?

Who called Paul an Apostle? No one except himself and his close friend and biographer Luke.

Who should call Paul an apostle to really be accepted as such? There are three authorities that can bestow him that title officially: The apostles themselves, if they treat him as a colleague in apostleship, that is enough. The other two are Christ and God.

Sadly, none of those three authorities called Paul an apostle, NOT EVEN ONCE.

In fact, the reverse is true. Let us look at Christ own words in Revelations 2:2

2 I know what you have done; I know how hard you have worked and how patient you have been. I know that you cannot tolerate evil people and that you have tested those who say they are apostles but are not, and have found out that they are liars.

Who is that? Do you know anyone else in history that claims to be an apostle? Seems that only Paul have the sole honor of doing that outrageous claim. Is he the one that Christ is referring to in Revelations 2:2? Let us see.

The church that Christ is talking to in that passage is Ephesus, the only church among the many that Paul wrote letters to. Where is the Church of Ephesus located? It is in Asia. Did Paul had a problem with the believers in Asia?

We want to remind you, friends, of the trouble we had in the province of Asia. The burdens laid upon us were so great and so heavy that we gave up all hope of staying alive. - 2 Corinthians 1:8

You know that everyone in the province of Asia, including Phygelus and Hermogenes, has deserted me. - 2 Timothy 1:15

Well, there they are, right in his own letters. The Church in Asia tried Paul's claim of apostleship and he was found lying. Why won't he just be an active believer? Why place himself in an office that is not given to him?

If Paul was really chosen by Christ with His miraculous appearance, would Christ forget to include Paul in the number of apostles? Surely not. Yet, let us see the last book of the bible speaking about the number of apostles.

14 The city's wall was built on twelve foundation stones, on which were written the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.- Revelations 21:12

This is revealing, Christ clearly said twelve!, If Paul is an accepted apostle by Christ himself, there would be 13 apostles. You may think well, did not Judas died and 11 faithful apostles were left? Is Paul the replacement of Judas?

The apostles themselves thought about that issue and here is what happened:

23 So they proposed two men: Joseph, who was called Barsabbas (also known as Justus), and Matthias. 24 Then they prayed, "Lord, you know the thoughts of everyone, so show us which of these two you have chosen 25 to serve as an apostle in the place of Judas, who left to go to the place where he belongs." 26 Then they drew lots to choose between the two men, and the one chosen was Matthias, who was added to the group of eleven apostles.- Acts 1:23-26

So Judas was really replaced! But it is not Paul who took his place, it is Matthias. Paul is only holding an imaginary office of apostleship.

Why? What are the qualifications to become a real apostle? Do Paul even have those qualifications?

21 "So then, someone must join us as a witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. He must be one of the men who were in our group during the whole time that the Lord Jesus traveled about with us, beginning from the time John preached his message of baptism until the day Jesus was taken up from us to heaven." - Acts 1:21

There! An apostle should have been taught by Christ from that period to ascension, an apostle should be an eyewitness of Christ activities and taught by Christ.

Can Paul qualify? No. Because in that period, Paul was an active Pharisee. And even the brief moment Paul claimed to have seen Christ, there is NO OTHER ONE WHO CAN TESTIFY for him that it was really Christ. As shown above, his own story about that short time does not add up. How can he be a witness for a person he did not meet? So he makes up his message along the way. Generously spicing it with "The Lord revealed to me". Do you believe everyone who claims something without corroborative proof? That is how Paul, he has no corroborative proof.

Consider the passages in the succeeding portion, would a person like this be even a real believer of Christ?:

17 When we arrived in Jerusalem, the believers welcomed us warmly. 18 The next day Paul went with us to see James; and all the church elders were present. 19 Paul greeted them and gave a complete report of everything that God had done among the Gentiles through his work. 20 After hearing him, they all praised God. Then they said, "Brother Paul, you can see how many thousands of Jews have become believers, and how devoted they all are to the Law. 21 They have been told that you have been teaching all the Jews who live in Gentile countries to abandon the Law of Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or follow the Jewish customs. 22 They are sure to hear that you have arrived. What should be done, then? 23 This is what we want you to do. There are four men here who have taken a vow. 24 Go along with them and join them in the ceremony of purification and pay their expenses; then they will be able to shave their heads. In this way everyone will know that there is no truth in any of the things that they have been told about you, but that you yourself live in accordance with the Law of Moses. 25 But as for the Gentiles who have become believers, we have sent them a letter telling them we decided that they must not eat any food that has been offered to idols, or any blood, or any animal that has been strangled, and that they must keep themselves from sexual immorality." 26 So Paul took the men and the next day performed the ceremony of purification with them. Then he went into the Temple and gave notice of how many days it would be until the end of the period of purification, when a sacrifice would be offered for each one of them. - Acts 21:17-26

What happened here? Paul met the brother of Christ, James and the rest of the elders in Jerusalem, remember the "new testament" part of the Bible has not been compiled yet on those days, so people are depending on the word of mouth about teachings. The believers in Jerusalem have heard that Paul is teaching other Jews in the gentile nations to abandon the Laws of Moses. Is that true? Yes! we have seen with the passages before that it is exactly the teaching of Paul, that the Law is not in effect anymore. But, James is giving Paul the benefit of the doubt, so he just asked Paul to do something that would show that Paul is still obeying the Law of Moses, which would prove that Paul cannot teach something to the contrary of what he does. Boy! Was James wrong! Paul can do that, Paul is a chameleon, yes, Paul is a hypocrite. He can teach one thing and do the exact opposite. If not, if Paul is not a hypocrite about his teaching that the "law is of no benefit" how would he respond to James' request? Yes! He would refuse to do that, and would reason that they are not under the Law anymore and that doing the deeds of the Law will put one "under a curse". But look at what happened, he even accepted paying for other men's expenses, so he can prove that what James and the Jerusalem elders heard were not true!

So Paul is a hypocrite. Should a hypocrite be an apostle of Christ?

Here is another one.

They have been told that you have been teaching all the Jews who live in Gentile countries to abandon the Law of Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or follow the Jewish customs. - Acts 21:21

Why does Paul say that the believers should not follow the law?

Those who depend on obeying the Law live under a curse. For the scripture says, "Whoever does not always obey everything that is written in the book of the Law is under God's curse!" - Galatians 3:10

That was his reason, Paul consider those that follow the Law to be under a curse!

Yet, what did Paul do?

Paul wanted to take Timothy along with him, so he circumcised him. He did so because all the Jews who lived in those places knew that Timothy's father was Greek. - Acts 16:3

So Paul is willing to put someone under a "curse" for his own intentions. That makes him selfish and a hypocrite.

What are other bizarre messages does Paul have?

1 If any of you have a dispute with another Christian, how dare you go before heathen judges instead of letting God's people settle the matter? 2 Don't you know that God's people will judge the world? Well, then, if you are to judge the world, aren't you capable of judging small matters? 3 Do you not know that we shall judge the angels? How much more, then, the things of this life! 4 If such matters come up, are you going to take them to be settled by people who have no standing in the church? 5 Shame on you! Surely there is at least one wise person in your fellowship who can settle a dispute between fellow Christians. 6 Instead, one Christian goes to court against another and lets unbelievers judge the case! - 1 Corinthians 6:1-6

We can applaud Paul's message here, it is very beautiful, eloquent and forceful, even adding expletives like "Shame on you!" made the message more clear. He teaches that problems within the believers should be dealt with by the believers.

What did he do when confronted with a problem from his brethren Jews??

7 When Paul arrived, the Jews who had come from Jerusalem stood around him and started making many serious charges against him, which they were not able to prove. 8 But Paul defended himself: "I have done nothing wrong against the Law of the Jews or against the Temple or against the Roman Emperor." 9 But Festus wanted to gain favor with the Jews, so he asked Paul, "Would you be willing to go to Jerusalem and be tried on these charges before me there?" 10 Paul said, "I am standing before the Emperor's own judgment court, where I should be tried. I have done no wrong to the Jews, as you yourself well know. 11 If I have broken the law and done something for which I deserve the death penalty, I do not ask to escape it. But if there is no truth in the charges they bring against me, no one can hand me over to them. I appeal to the Emperor." 12 Then Festus, after conferring with his advisers, answered, "You have appealed to the Emperor, so to the Emperor you will go."- Acts 25:7-12

There are two things that should stand out in this passage: One, Paul's claim that he has done nothing wrong against the Law of the Jews and two, Paul's appeal to the Emperor of Rome. Is Paul really innocent about doing anything against the Law of the Jews? No, in fact up until now, we clearly know what he taught while roaming around. He is teaching other people not to follow the Law, that, in itself is deserving death according to the Jewish law!

Whoever does not obey the law of your God and the law of the king must surely be punished by death, banishment, confiscation of property, or imprisonment. -Ezra 7:26

If not obeying the Law deserves death, much more is the guilt of the one teaching others to do the same!

Then the second one, Paul was being accused by the Jews, Paul said he is a Jew, so they are both believers! To whom did he appeal for judgement? Did he practiced what he preached? No! He appealed to the gentile Emperor! He even refused to be handled by his brethren! Shame on who?!

Here is another cleverly-designed-to-deceive-sentence of Paul:

19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts. - 1 Corinthians 7:19

Paul is cleverly hiding in the "authority of God" by claiming that "keeping God's commandment is what counts" while encouraging his readers to treat "circumcision as nothing". Wake up! Whose command is circumcision??!! - see Genesis 17:11. Paul is really a deceptive teacher of lies.

How about you? Are you one of those people who belong to a church or a ministry where Paul's teachings are upheld? Do you believe Paul to be an apostle? Do you prefer his teachings while it directly opposed those of Christ?

It is time to wake up. Save yourself and your family from the poisonous teachings of Paul!

PAUL IS NOT A CHRIST FOLLOWER, AND WONT QUALIFY TO BE AN APOSTLE.

He is in fact an ANTI-CHRIST.